2 August 1840
adams-john10 Neal Millikan Religion Transcendentalism
53 Quincy. August 1840.

2. V. Sunday

Quincy Josiah junr

Communion day at Meeting— Mr Lunt preached his morning Sermon, from Acts 17.21. “For all the Athenians and Strangers which were there, spent their time in nothing else but either to tell or to hear some new thing”— It is the doom of the Christian church to be always distracted with controversy; and where religion is most in honour, there the perversity of the human heart breeds the sharpest conflicts of the brain— The Sentiment of Religion is at this time perhaps more potent and prevailing in New-England, than many other portion of the Christian world— For many years since the establishment of the theological school at Andover the Calvinists and Unitarians have been battling with each other upon the atonement, the divinity of Jesus Christ and the Trinity— This has now very much subsided—but other wandering of minds takes the place of that, and equally lets the wolf into the fold. A crack-brained young man named Ralph Waldo Emerson, son of my once loved friend, William Emerson, and a Classmate of my lamented son George, after failing in the every day avocations of a Unitarian preacher and school-master, and starts a new doctrine of transcendentalism, declares all the old revelations superannuated and worn out, and announces the approach of new Revelations and prophesies— Garrison and the Non-resistant abolitionists, Brownson and the Marat Democrats, Phrenology and Animal Magnetism all come in furnishing each some plausible rascality as an ingredient for the bubbling cauldron of religion and politics— Pearce Cranch ex-ephibis preached here last week, and gave out quite a stream of this transcendentalism, most unexpectedly— Mr Lunt’s discourse this morning was intended to counteract the effect of these wild and visionary phantasies, and he spoke with just severity of the application of this Spirit of hurly burly innovation to the most important and solemn duties of the Christian faith— He treated the subject but in part; and promised to discourse further upon it hereafter— Mr Lunt’s opinions favour a compromise between the past and the future; disapproving alike the obstinate and bigoted adherence to establishments and dogmas, merely because they are old; and the restless and reckless pursuit of mere innovation— Mr Peter Whitney was not in the pulpit and Mr Lunt administered the Communion alone. After dinner, Mr Lunt’s Sermon was from Matthew 28.19. “Go ye, therefore, and teach all Nations, baptizing them, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost.” This is also a deeply controversial text, and Mr Lunt admitted that it was one of those upon which the doctrine of the Trinity was built, and is advocated— But he thought that Doctrine so incompatible with the first principle of the unity of the supreme Creator of the universe, that it was not worth discussing, and that the Holy Ghost was but the emanation of the Spirit of God, pervading all time and all space but giving no countenance whatever to the Creed of a divine Trinity. I read part of a Sermon of Barrow, upon rash judgments— Coll. Josiah Quincy junr. paid us an Evening visit.

A A