1 December 1836
adams-john10 Neal Millikan Science and Technology Press Federalist Papers
388 Thursday 1. December 1836.

1. VI:30— Thursday.

Pedrich Ferdinand Todsen George Taliaferro John Cameron George

Continuing the perusal of Mr Johnson’s Treatise upon Language. I find him in Lecture disclaiming with great earnestness any intention to unsettle the belief of divine revelation in the holy Scriptures. So does Benjamin Constant— So did the Count de Buffon in his correspondence with the Sorbonne— I believe Johnson sincere; and he declares emphatically that he never would have published his Lectures if he had believed his theory incompatible with faith in divine revelation— Dr. Johnson supposes that Pope did not know that his optimism in the Essay on Man was fatalism; and Alexander B. in excluding religious faith from the conclusions of his own argument assigns no reason for the exception. The general tenor of his argument is that words have no signification except as reports of the physical senses— That all knowledge consists of sights, sounds, feels, tastes and smells—but in his classification he admits another class of thoughts which he calls verbal; and in another Lecture he allows internal feelings to be also a source of thoughts— The words mind, and idea, are totally excluded from his vocabulary— His broad Theory is that language is and can be significant of nothing but Sensation— And as this doctrine makes of the universe a mass of sensuality without Soul, and without reasoning faculty, he runs foul of natural religion of theism of mathematics of metaphysics—of all art and all Science, protesting all the time that he means no harm to religion— Mr Johnson is a remarkable instance of the misfortune of intense and incessant meditation, destitute of dear conception— Morning visit from Mr Taliaferro, to whom I gave a copy of my Eulogy on James Madison.— Mr Pedrich, and Dr Todsen came and I went with them to the old Episcopal church at Georgetown, where I saw his groups of statuary, his busts of Mr Van Buren, Mr Clay, and Mr Joseph R. Ingersoll and his designs for Basso Relievo Sculpture in a Church. He was urgent to have my opinion of his works, and I could not give it for it was not favourable I could not flatter and was unwilling to discourage him.— His groups are mere commonplace imitation of the antique— His allegorical faces very uncaptivating; and his busts no likenesses— It was unfortunate for him that there were in the same building busts of Mr Woodbury, the Secretary and of Mr Preston the Senator from South-Carolina by Hiram Power of Kentucky, and superior as likenesses and as works of art to the busts by Mr Pedrich— His designs for Bas Relief embrace 84 Subjects Half from the old and half from the new Testament— They are in the Classical Style of Italian Painting, and represent God almighty in the form of an old man with a hooked nose, a bushy beard rolled up in thirty or forty yards of blanketing. Then he represents the Patriarchs Abraham and Isaac in precisely the same form, and in the same costume— Mr Pedrich has a recommendation from his master Thorwaldsen certifying that he has considerable talent, which is unquestionable; but he has not that ideal conception of grace and beauty which is the perfection of Sculpture and Painting, and without which the mere imitation of nature, physical nature, is 389fit only for Signposts and Milestones.— On returning home after a visit to the Bank of the Metropolis, I found at my door a person named George Cameron, who exhibited to me drawings of an invention for guarding the boilers of Steam engines from explosion; for which he said he had a patent; and he had a petition to the Secretary of the Navy; for the sum of 300 dollars to make experiments of his invention— He complained that the Secretary of the Navy had refused him the money, and as I had neither power nor will to redress that grievance, he said he would lay his invention, before a Committee of Congress— To this I had no objection— The man had as Wise said of Silas Wright a Cognac face. and he had burnished it before coming here— Just before dinner I received the proof slips from the National Intelligencer Office of that part of my Eulogy on Madison which is to be published in the paper to-morrow Morning— I had corrected it and took the opportunity to rectify an error in the pamphlet, which stated the numbers of Publius at 86—they were 85— After dinner it occurred to me to correct another error into which I had fallen in enumerating the numbers of the federalist written by Mr Madison. I had omitted the numbers 62 and 63— I wrote a note correcting this error, and enclosed it to the Foreman of the National Intelligencer, with a request that it might be subjoined to the part of the Eulogy to be published in the daily paper to-morrow— Mary and Elizabeth spent the Evening at Mrs W. S. Smith— I went for them and walked home with them between 9 and 10 O’Clock

A A