John Quincy Adams’s (JQA) diary, which was inspired by his father John Adams (JA) and started as a travel journal, initiated a lifelong writing obsession. In 1779, twelve-year-old JQA made his second trip abroad to accompany his father’s diplomatic mission. While in Europe, he attended various schools and traveled to St. Petersburg as an interpreter during Francis Dana’s mission to Russia. He subsequently served as JA’s secretary at Paris during the final months before the Anglo-American Definitive Peace Treaty was signed in September 1783. Two years later, JQA returned to the US. After graduating from Harvard College in 1787, he moved to Newburyport to read law under Theophilus Parsons and in 1790 he established a legal practice in Boston. JQA’s skill as a writer brought him public acclaim, and in 1794 President George Washington nominated him as US minister resident to the Netherlands.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) entered diplomatic service in September 1794 as US minister resident to the Netherlands. He married Louisa Catherine Johnson (LCA) in July 1797 after a fourteen-month engagement, and their three sons were born in this period. During his father John Adams’s (JA) presidency they moved to Berlin where, as US minister plenipotentiary, JQA signed a new Prussian-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce. JQA returned to the US in 1801 and entered politics, elected first to the Massachusetts senate in 1802 and then to the US Senate in 1803. His contentious relationship with fellow Federalist members over his support of some Democratic-Republican policies led to his removal from office. In May 1808 the Federalist-controlled Massachusetts legislature voted to replace him at the end of his term, prompting JQA’s resignation in June. Between 1806 and 1809 he also served as the first Boylston Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Harvard.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) returned to diplomatic service in August 1809 as the US’s first minister plenipotentiary to Russia. In St. Petersburg JQA was well-liked by Emperor Alexander I and closely followed the battles of the Napoleonic Wars then raging across Europe. When the US declared war on Great Britain in 1812, Adams watched from afar as the conflict dragged on for two years. In April 1814, he traveled to Ghent, Belgium, as part of the US delegation to negotiate an end to the war with England; the Treaty of Ghent was signed on Christmas Eve. Subsequently appointed US minister to the Court of St. James’s in May 1815, JQA served in London for the next two years.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) served as the US secretary of state during James Monroe’s presidency. Adams’s duties included organizing and responding to all State Department correspondence and negotiating agreements beneficial to the US. His achievements as secretary of state include the Anglo-American Convention of 1818, which established the US border with Canada along the 49th parallel, and the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819 (Transcontinental Treaty), which resulted in the US acquisition of Florida. JQA also formulated the policy that became known as the Monroe Doctrine, in which the US called for European non-intervention in the western hemisphere, specifically in the affairs of newly independent Latin American nations. As Monroe’s presidency came to an end, JQA was among the top candidates in the 1824 presidential election. When no candidate earned the necessary majority, the House of Representatives decided the election in JQA’s favor in February 1825.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) was inaugurated as the sixth president of the US on 4 March 1825 and began his administration with an ambitious agenda of improvements for American society. His presidency was embattled. Supporters of Andrew Jackson, who believed their candidate had unfairly lost the 1824 election, worked ceaselessly to foil JQA’s plans. Domestically, JQA refused to replace civil servants with partisan supporters, and his administration became involved in disputes between the Creek Nation and the state of Georgia. JQA’s foreign policy also suffered, as partisan bickering in Congress failed to provide timely funding for US delegates to attend the 1826 Congress of Panama. Political mudslinging in advance of the 1828 presidential election was particularly fierce, and by mid-1827 JQA knew he would not be reelected.
In 1831 John Quincy Adams (JQA) became the only former president to subsequently serve in the US House of Representatives. As the chairman of the House Committee on Manufactures, he helped compose the compromise tariff bill of 1832. He traveled to Philadelphia as part of a committee that investigated the Bank of the United States, drafting a minority report in support of rechartering the bank after disagreeing with the committee’s majority report. JQA regularly presented the antislavery petitions he received from across the country, and he vehemently opposed the passage of the Gag Rule in 1836 that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. He opposed the annexation of Texas, and in 1838 he delivered a marathon speech condemning the evils of slavery. JQA also chaired the committee that oversaw the bequest of James Smithson, which was used to establish the Smithsonian Institution.
During his final years of service in the US House of Representatives, John Quincy Adams (JQA) continued to oppose the Gag Rule that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. In 1839 he joined the defense team for the Africans who revolted aboard the Spanish slave ship Amistad. The Supreme Court declared the Amistad Africans free on 9 March 1841 after JQA delivered oral arguments in their favor. In 1842 JQA faced a censure hearing and ably defended himself against charges from southern congressmen. He introduced a successful resolution that finally led to the repeal of the Gag Rule in 1844. JQA voted against both the annexation of Texas in 1845 and the US declaration of war with Mexico in 1846. He collapsed on the floor of the House on 21 February 1848 and died two days later.
- Lawrence— Joseph
- Stewart
- Stewart
- Adams D
r - Van Rensselaer Stephen
- Gregg
- Davis Warren R.
- Taylor
- Brent. Daniel
- Seymour Horatio
- Davis, of Port Tobacco
- Watkins— George
- Smith— William
- Thomas
- Wistar. Bartholomew
- Bettle— Samuel
- Clay— Henry
- Campino
- Perez— J. J.
- Gellineau
- Whittlesey, Elisha
- Taylor, from New-York
- Bailey John
After my usual morning walk round the Capitol Square, I gave a sitting of
an hour to Mr
Harding the Painter, at his own lodgings in the
Pennsylvania Avenue— Mr Lawrence, a member of the
House of Representatives from Pennsylvania, introduced two brothers by
the name of Stewart, and a
Dr Adams, all
his constituents of Washington County Pennsylvania, General Van Rensselaer came
with a Mr Gregg,
from the Western part of New-York— Mr Davis a member of the House
of Representatives from South-Carolina, with a young Mr Taylor, son to the
Governor of that State—going
to the Law School at Litchfield, Connecticut—where Mr Davis told me he had himself been one
year— Mr
Seymour the Senator from Vermont introduced a young man,
from Port Tobacco in Maryland, named Davis,
who lodges at the same house with him— Mr
Seymour asked me if there was any prospect of a new diplomatic
appointment abroad for Mr Heman Allen. I told him
there was no Mission of the Rank of Minister Plenipotentiary to which I
could appoint him for the present— George
Watkins brought me from the Department of State a Letter
from Mr
Clay to Mr Gallatin, upon the subject
of his agency in relation to the North-eastern boundary arbitration;
which I approved— Mr Brent was here twice—the first time, with a
Letter from Charles Walsh of
Baltimore, repeating an old application for a diplomatic appointment— He
now wishes for that of Charge d’Affaires to the Republic of Colombia, in
the place of Beaufort T. Watts
who is returning home— The second was with a speech which Mr
Campino, the Minister from Chili proposed to deliver to
me, on his presentation, with a translation— In that interval Mr Smith,
member of the Senate from South-Carolina came 461and
introduced a young man, named Thomas, as a
nephew of the late Mr John Gaillard. He has however not been in
South-Carolina these four or five years. Bartholomew Wistar and Samuel Bettle are two Quaker companions of Elizabeth Robson, the female
preacher, from England. They came to inform me that they had obtained
permission for her to preach to-morrow in the Hall of the House of
Representatives, and to request my attendance— About two O’Clock Mr Clay came and presented to me Don Joaquin
Campino, who delivered his Letter of Credence as Minister Extraordinary
and Plenipotentiary from the Republic of Chili— He addressed me in very
few words in Spanish, which were explained to me, by his interpreter—and
which comprized only a small part of the Speech which he had delivered
in writing— The Speech was complimentary to the United States, and
personally to me, expressing the grateful acknowledgment of the Chilian
Government that the United States had been the first power which had
recognized the Independence of Chile, and to send them a Minister— In
return it observed that he was the first Minister ever sent by Chili to
a foreign power—apologised for the delay of this reciprocation—expressed
the satisfaction of his Government with the conduct of Mr Allen, during his residence among them,
and also with that of Mr Larned now the Charge
d’Affaires—it finally expressed the earnest wish of Mr Campino that while residing here, he might
be instrumental in cementing the friendly relations between the two
Governments. I answered briefly every part of his speech as if he had
delivered it first expressing my regret at not being able to speak to
him in his own language, I desired his interpreter to say that the
People and Government of the United States had witnessed with deep and
constant sympathy the arduous struggle of the People of Chili for
National Independence. They had taken pleasure in being the first among
the Nations to recognize that event, and in sending the first diplomatic
Mission, which had ever been received in Chili— I desired him, in
writing to his Government to say that I had learnt with the highest
satisfaction that our late Minister, Mr
Allen, had so conducted himself during his residence as to have secured
the approbation of the Chilian Government; and that our present Chargé
d’Affaires Mr Larned had also made himself
acceptable, as I hoped and trusted he would continue to do— For the
Sentiments of personal respects, and kindness, tendered from the
President of Chili, to
myself, I requested him to say that I received them with much
sensibility and with a cordial and reciprocal return— I joined also very
sincerely in the wish of Mr Campino, that
his Mission might contribute to improve the intercourse and friendly
relations between the two Countries— That his reception and treatment
here, might render his residence among us as agreeable as possible, and
that on finally returning home, he might carry with him an opinion of
our Country still more favourable than that with which he had come— The
Secretary of Legation as well as
the interpreter came with Mr Campino. The
Audience was over in ten minutes; and Mr
Clay remained with me a short time after the Minister and his Legation
had withdrawn— He mentioned a new Candidate for the Office of
Treasurer—Mr
Savage, now the Chief Justice of New-York— The motives
suggested for this appointment are political; and one of them is to
prepare for Mr Savages being brought forward
as the Candidate for the Office of Governor of New-York— Mr Clay spoke also of the Mission to England,
and named Mr
Rush, Governor
Barbour and Mr Webster, as persons perhaps
inclined to accept it— In fitness for the Office Mr Webster stands pre-eminent— The political considerations at
the present moment are unfavourable to his appointment— Mr Clay said that if Governor Barbour should
be appointed he would certainly not remain more than a year or two in
England; and he thought it would be best, if Mr Webster would postpone his pretensions for that time; but
that after what had passed, if Mr Webster
should insist upon it, he thought he should be appointed— Mr
Whittlesey, a member of the House of Representatives from
Ohio, introduced a young man from the State of New-York, by the name of
Taylor— Mr Bailey of Massachusetts came
and passed a couple of hours with me this Evening: His object was to
make a proposition, in the first instance not very distinctly disclosed,
but which I chose immediately to understand, and to meet in a manner
altogether explicit. He ultimately informed me that it had been
suggested to him by Mr Webster— He said that
the Election of Governor, and of the Legislature of Kentucky would take
place next August— That the great and decisive struggle of the 462parties would be at that election, which would
decide the fate of the subsequent election of electors of President and
Vice-President, in November. These Electors, by a recent act of the
Legislature, are to be chosen by a general ticket throughout the State—
Immense exertions are making by the opposition party to carry this
Election of August— They spend much money, and there is an indispensable
necessity of concentrating them in the same manner— Now Mr Bailey’s question to me was whether I had
a sum from five to ten thousand dollars, that I was disposed to give,
without enquiring how it would be disposed of, but which would be
employed, to secure the Election of General Metcalfe as Governor of Kentucky next August— I
answered that there was a sentiment, expressed first by the late
Mr
Lowndes—much repeated since, by General Jackson and his friends
though not practiced upon by them, but hitherto invariably observed by
me; that the Presidency of the United States was an office neither to be
sought nor declined— To pay money for securing it directly or
indirectly, was in my opinion incorrect in principle— This was my first
and decisive reason, for declining such a contribution— A second reason
was that I could not even command a sum of five thousand dollars,
without involving myself in debt for it— And a third was that if I once
departed from the principle, and gave money, there was no rule either of
expediency or of morality, which would enable me to limit the amount of
expenditure which I ought to in cur— I could certainly appropriate half
a million dollars to the same object without transcending any Law, and
with as much propriety as I could devote 5000 to the election of a
Governor of Kentucky— Mr Bailey seemed
surprized to hear that I could not raise five thousand dollars without
borrowing—and said Mr Webster had told him,
I had a large sum, fifty or sixty thousand dollars lying dead, in a Bank
at Boston— I told Mr Baily candidly the
state of my affairs— That the expenses of my family, and the support of
my three Sons now absorb very nearly the whole of my public Salary— That
all my real Estate in Quincy and Boston is mortgaged for the payment of
my debts— That the income of my whole private Estate, is less than 6000
dollars a year, and that I am paying at least 2000 of that for interest
upon my debt. Finally that upon going out of Office in one year from
this time, destitute of all means of acquiring property, it will only be
by the sacrifice of that which I now possess that I shall be able to
support my family— I note as a remarkable incident this proposition to
me to contribute five or ten thousand dollars to carry the election of a
Governor and Legislature of Kentucky— The mode of expenditure is by the
circulation of newspapers, pamphlets and hand-bills— It is practiced by
all parties, and its tendency is to render elections altogether venal.
The coincidence of Mr Clark’s proposal that I should write a
pamphlet in answer to Ingham’s
Slanders about my Accounts, with Mr Clay’s
opinion that Mr Webster if he insists upon
it should be appointed to the Mission of Great Britain, and with Mr Webster’s proposal that I should spent
five or ten thousand dollars upon the election of a Governor of
Kentucky, is perhaps all accidental; but in the operations of parties
objects of great dissimilarity to each other are often connected by
imperceptible links together.
