27 September 1829
adams-john10 Timothy Giblin
264

27. V. Sunday.

Adams. T. B. junr     Isaac Hull Quincy Josiah junr

Heard Mr Lamson of Dedham in the morning from Jeremiah 4.14. [“]O Jerusalem, wash thine heart from wickedness that thou mayest be saved how long shall thy vain thoughts lodge within thee?[”] And in the afternoon from Luke 8.15. [“]But that on the good ground are they, which in an honest and good heart, having heard the word, keep it, and bring forth fruit with Patience.” These were two moral Essays, extremely well written and well meditated— Sermons of this description are very pleasing to me; but there is an air of family resemblance among them all which colours them all with one complection. What would be the success of a Minister who should adopt the principle of giving to his discourses as much variety as possible— Who should at one time describe a scriptural character—at another discuss a point of controversy; at a third comment upon a parable; at a fourth dwell upon a point of morals— Perhaps it would 265require a variety of Talent, with Genius and Learning; but such a preacher must be generally pleasing— Mr Lamson’s Sermons had no allusion to the thoughts of other men. Very little even to his texts; all was spun out from the Reflections of his own mind— Differing in this respect from a Sermon of Bourdaloue, which I read yesterday and this morning upon the duties of Parents to their children— This is the first Sermon of that celebrated preacher that I have ever read; but I think I shall read many more. He was one of the most famous preachers of the time of Louis 14. but differing much in the manner from Bossuet, Flechier, or Massillon— Bourdaloue quotes the Saints and Fathers in great profusion— His reasoning is much strengthened by quotations— His divisions of his subject are artificial and ingenious— Part of his argument from the peculiar character of the Tenets of the Romish Church, is not applicable to persons of the Protestant Churches— But much of his doctrine belongs to general morality— He urges that Parents have no right to controul the vocation of their children, and yet that Parents are the persons responsible for the vices of their children. I read also the Sermons 14 and 15. of the Volume of Dr Freeman—the first upon Irresolution, and the second upon the extent of Christ’s Kingdom. Coll. Quincy spent the Evening with us; and told us he should remove with his family next Wednesday to their Winter-quarters in Boston— Thomas B. Adams junr. and Isaac Hull Adams dined with us.

A A