John Quincy Adams’s (JQA) diary, which was inspired by his father John Adams (JA) and started as a travel journal, initiated a lifelong writing obsession. In 1779, twelve-year-old JQA made his second trip abroad to accompany his father’s diplomatic mission. While in Europe, he attended various schools and traveled to St. Petersburg as an interpreter during Francis Dana’s mission to Russia. He subsequently served as JA’s secretary at Paris during the final months before the Anglo-American Definitive Peace Treaty was signed in September 1783. Two years later, JQA returned to the US. After graduating from Harvard College in 1787, he moved to Newburyport to read law under Theophilus Parsons and in 1790 he established a legal practice in Boston. JQA’s skill as a writer brought him public acclaim, and in 1794 President George Washington nominated him as US minister resident to the Netherlands.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) entered diplomatic service in September 1794 as US minister resident to the Netherlands. He married Louisa Catherine Johnson (LCA) in July 1797 after a fourteen-month engagement, and their three sons were born in this period. During his father John Adams’s (JA) presidency they moved to Berlin where, as US minister plenipotentiary, JQA signed a new Prussian-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce. JQA returned to the US in 1801 and entered politics, elected first to the Massachusetts senate in 1802 and then to the US Senate in 1803. His contentious relationship with fellow Federalist members over his support of some Democratic-Republican policies led to his removal from office. In May 1808 the Federalist-controlled Massachusetts legislature voted to replace him at the end of his term, prompting JQA’s resignation in June. Between 1806 and 1809 he also served as the first Boylston Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Harvard.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) returned to diplomatic service in August 1809 as the US’s first minister plenipotentiary to Russia. In St. Petersburg JQA was well-liked by Emperor Alexander I and closely followed the battles of the Napoleonic Wars then raging across Europe. When the US declared war on Great Britain in 1812, Adams watched from afar as the conflict dragged on for two years. In April 1814, he traveled to Ghent, Belgium, as part of the US delegation to negotiate an end to the war with England; the Treaty of Ghent was signed on Christmas Eve. Subsequently appointed US minister to the Court of St. James’s in May 1815, JQA served in London for the next two years.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) served as the US secretary of state during James Monroe’s presidency. Adams’s duties included organizing and responding to all State Department correspondence and negotiating agreements beneficial to the US. His achievements as secretary of state include the Anglo-American Convention of 1818, which established the US border with Canada along the 49th parallel, and the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819 (Transcontinental Treaty), which resulted in the US acquisition of Florida. JQA also formulated the policy that became known as the Monroe Doctrine, in which the US called for European non-intervention in the western hemisphere, specifically in the affairs of newly independent Latin American nations. As Monroe’s presidency came to an end, JQA was among the top candidates in the 1824 presidential election. When no candidate earned the necessary majority, the House of Representatives decided the election in JQA’s favor in February 1825.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) was inaugurated as the sixth president of the US on 4 March 1825 and began his administration with an ambitious agenda of improvements for American society. His presidency was embattled. Supporters of Andrew Jackson, who believed their candidate had unfairly lost the 1824 election, worked ceaselessly to foil JQA’s plans. Domestically, JQA refused to replace civil servants with partisan supporters, and his administration became involved in disputes between the Creek Nation and the state of Georgia. JQA’s foreign policy also suffered, as partisan bickering in Congress failed to provide timely funding for US delegates to attend the 1826 Congress of Panama. Political mudslinging in advance of the 1828 presidential election was particularly fierce, and by mid-1827 JQA knew he would not be reelected.
In 1831 John Quincy Adams (JQA) became the only former president to subsequently serve in the US House of Representatives. As the chairman of the House Committee on Manufactures, he helped compose the compromise tariff bill of 1832. He traveled to Philadelphia as part of a committee that investigated the Bank of the United States, drafting a minority report in support of rechartering the bank after disagreeing with the committee’s majority report. JQA regularly presented the antislavery petitions he received from across the country, and he vehemently opposed the passage of the Gag Rule in 1836 that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. He opposed the annexation of Texas, and in 1838 he delivered a marathon speech condemning the evils of slavery. JQA also chaired the committee that oversaw the bequest of James Smithson, which was used to establish the Smithsonian Institution.
During his final years of service in the US House of Representatives, John Quincy Adams (JQA) continued to oppose the Gag Rule that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. In 1839 he joined the defense team for the Africans who revolted aboard the Spanish slave ship Amistad. The Supreme Court declared the Amistad Africans free on 9 March 1841 after JQA delivered oral arguments in their favor. In 1842 JQA faced a censure hearing and ably defended himself against charges from southern congressmen. He introduced a successful resolution that finally led to the repeal of the Gag Rule in 1844. JQA voted against both the annexation of Texas in 1845 and the US declaration of war with Mexico in 1846. He collapsed on the floor of the House on 21 February 1848 and died two days later.
r Barbour said he had seen the President who
was willing and desirous that all his communications to the Senate
should be published. Mr James Lloyd, Senator from Massachusetts, who
came in while I was in this Conversation with Barbour said that the
proceedings of the Senate on the Convention, if published alone, without
the documents from the President, would be unintelligible, the yeas and
nays always having reference to the Convention communicated— Mr Barbour concluded to press for the
publication of the whole— Mr Lloyd made some
enquiries respecting the remonstrance of the Chargé d’Affaires of Spain, Salmon,
against certain decisions of the Florida Treaty Commissioners— I told
him that the paper had barely been sent to the Commissioners, without
comment, the Executive Government disclaiming all controul over, or
interference with their decisions— Mr Edward Livingston came to
urge the immediate appointment of a District judge for Louisiana, in the
place of John Dick, deceased— He
named several persons—Watts,
Harper, Davizac, and Thomas Bolling Robertson, the
present Governor of Louisiana, whose term of service will expire at the
end of the present year. Livingston said he was afraid, if Robertson was
appointed that he would accept conditionally, and thus keep the Office
vacant upwards of a year, for it has already been more than half a year
vacant, judge Dick’s illness, having disabled him from holding any
Court. Livingston said too that Robertson had so many of the wild
Virginia notions about the judiciary, that he feared he would do
mischief on the Bench— He spoke well of all the other Candidates, whom
he named; and of Smith, the District
Attorney—but especially so of Davizac, his wife’s brother, whose
appointment he said would be peculiarly gratifying to all the French
part of the population— Mr. A. B. Woodward came, and
spoke upon his project for the establishment of a Home Department, and
also of a Quarto Volume, written by him and printed at Philadelphia, a
copy of which I had yesterday received for him and sent it this morning
to my Office— He told me he had never 335seen it, though it was printed at
Philadelphia, for him— At the office there was a succession of visitors—
Hayden of New-York, and
M’Duffie of South Carolina,
members of the house came to take leave. M’Duffie, having reference to
the Presidential Election said he was returning to Carolina, and as
there might be in the Legislature of that State a contested support of
Mr Crawford and of me, he should be glad, if I
had no objection to stating them, to know my sentiments upon the Tariff
policy. I told them freely— That it was one of those subjects in which
great opposing interests were to be conciliated by a Spirit of mutual
accommodation and concession— I was satisfied with the Tariff bill as it
has passed, because it appeared to me to have been elaborated precisely
to that point. I thought I had seen in it an admirable illustration of
the practical operation of our National Government. The two parties had
contested every inch of the ground between them with great ardour and
ability; and the details of the bill had finally brought them to
questions decided by the casting vote of the presiding Officer in each
house; and an adjustment by conference between the two houses— With the
result it was reasonable to expect that both parties would be satisfied.
M’Duffie appeared to be well satisfied with it himself, and he said that
the final vote upon it in the house gave a majority of fifty votes in
its favour— I told him that there was another subject, upon which my
opinions had been greatly misrepresented in the Southern Country, with a
view to excite local prejudices against me. It was upon the Slave
question generally and the Missouri Restriction particularly— My opinion
had been against the proposed restriction in Missouri, as contravening,
both the Constitution, and the Louisiana Treaty. This was the first
Missouri question— The second was upon an Article introduced into the
Constitution of the State of Missouri, which I thought contrary to the
Constitution of the United States. I then stated explicitly what my
opinions had been upon both questions, and noticed the artifice of the
misrepresentation which from my opposition to the Article in the
Missouri Constitution inferred my having favoured the restriction. I
added that the Article of the Missouri Constitution required the
Legislature of that State to do precisely what the Legislature of his
own State of South Carolina, had since done—and which Judge William Johnson, a native and
Citizen of the State itself had pronounced to be contrary to the
Constitution of the United States— M’Duffie said he had no doubt it was
so; and was very glad I had given him this explanation. I called at the
President’s, and spoke of the Brazilian chargé d’Affaires, whom he had
determined to receive to-morrow. I advised that we should first
ascertain whether the Brazilian Government considered itself bound by
the Treaties of Portugal with Great-Britain for the suppression of the
Slave-trade; and whether the Emperor
was disposed to suppress the trade itself— To this the President agreed;
and on returning to the Office, I sent for Rebello, who immediately came— He
said the Emperor had declared by a Proclamation, set forth in the
succinct narrative furnished me by Rebello himself, that he considered
himself bound by all the Treaties of Portugal previously concluded; and
added that he would send me an extract from his Instructions, in which
the Emperors disposition for the total abolition of the traffic was
pronounced in the most decisive manner— I asked him what number of
Slaves had been introduced into Brazil in the course of the last year.
He said from seven to eight thousand— What was the proportion of black
and coloured people in Brazil to the whites? four or five to one— Under
what flag the trade was now carried on to Brazil?— He said it was in
vessels which bore the Portugueze flag at the Settlements, in Africa,
where they procured the Slaves, and whence they departed, but took the
Brazilian flag upon arriving in the Ports of Brazil— He said also that
the importations were now confined to such as are shipped from places
more than five degrees South of the Equator, where existing
Establishments embracing large masses of property would require time to
admit of their being totally broken up— He afterwards sent me, a note
including the extract from his Instructions, and a reference to the
Emperor’s Proclamation, which he had mentioned— Young Hodgson called at the Office,
and had a Portugueze pamphlet, a 336periodical work published in Brazil, in
which there were several Essays for and against the abolition of the
Slave-trade— Those in favour of the abolition, having been written by
Mr Rebello himself, who was the Judge of
the mixed Commission under the Treaty with Great Britain at Rio de
Janeiro— David Trimble, member of
the House from Kentucky came and took leave. He spoke of his earnestness
in support of the election of Mr Clay to the Presidency; and
said he hoped there was less of personal animosity between him and me
than there had been heretofore— I told him there never had been on my
part, any animosity, other than that which Mr Clay had chosen to raise— Trimble said he did not wish to
enter upon this subject, and after some other remarks said all he could
tell me was that of the Candidates before the public; for the
Presidency, Mr Clay would be his first
choice; but I should not be his last— He meant I should take this as a
proof of his friendly disposition to me. John Edwards, Mr Southard, Baron Stackelberg and Wyer were here. I had a pardon made out
for Perez, which I sent to the
President to sign— But the President chose to reserve it, and directed
me to write to the District
Attorney Tillotson— Edwards was with me, when I sent
Thruston to the President
with the pardon; and when he came back with the direction to write
instead of the pardon signed, Edwards seemed as if he was going into a
convulsion— He at last wept abundantly— I told him kindly that he must
not suffer himself to be so much agitated; to make himself easy, and be
assured that the man would ultimately be pardoned— Southard came to say
that the President inclined to the appointment of judge W. P. Van Ness as fourth
Auditor, and asked if I had any objection— I said I wished the President
would appoint him; chiefly to get him out of his present Office, where
his discordancy with judge
Thomson the Circuit judge was very pernicious, besides
other Considerations— Stackelberg came to speak of his intended
departure; and to enquire what Salvage is allowed in the United States
upon recaptured vessels— In the Evening, walking out I met N. Biddle, the President of U.S.
Bank, with Asbury Dickens— Mr Crawford was taken ill again on Saturday
Night, and keeps his bed— I called on Alexander Hamilton, at the President’s request, to ask if
he was now ready to consider his resignation as taking effect; so that
the nomination of Worthington might be renewed— He said yes; but that
Worthington would be
rejected by the Senate, and was moreover incompetent— After I returned
home George Sullivan came and
past the remainder of the Evening with me.
