John Quincy Adams’s (JQA) diary, which was inspired by his father John Adams (JA) and started as a travel journal, initiated a lifelong writing obsession. In 1779, twelve-year-old JQA made his second trip abroad to accompany his father’s diplomatic mission. While in Europe, he attended various schools and traveled to St. Petersburg as an interpreter during Francis Dana’s mission to Russia. He subsequently served as JA’s secretary at Paris during the final months before the Anglo-American Definitive Peace Treaty was signed in September 1783. Two years later, JQA returned to the US. After graduating from Harvard College in 1787, he moved to Newburyport to read law under Theophilus Parsons and in 1790 he established a legal practice in Boston. JQA’s skill as a writer brought him public acclaim, and in 1794 President George Washington nominated him as US minister resident to the Netherlands.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) entered diplomatic service in September 1794 as US minister resident to the Netherlands. He married Louisa Catherine Johnson (LCA) in July 1797 after a fourteen-month engagement, and their three sons were born in this period. During his father John Adams’s (JA) presidency they moved to Berlin where, as US minister plenipotentiary, JQA signed a new Prussian-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce. JQA returned to the US in 1801 and entered politics, elected first to the Massachusetts senate in 1802 and then to the US Senate in 1803. His contentious relationship with fellow Federalist members over his support of some Democratic-Republican policies led to his removal from office. In May 1808 the Federalist-controlled Massachusetts legislature voted to replace him at the end of his term, prompting JQA’s resignation in June. Between 1806 and 1809 he also served as the first Boylston Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Harvard.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) returned to diplomatic service in August 1809 as the US’s first minister plenipotentiary to Russia. In St. Petersburg JQA was well-liked by Emperor Alexander I and closely followed the battles of the Napoleonic Wars then raging across Europe. When the US declared war on Great Britain in 1812, Adams watched from afar as the conflict dragged on for two years. In April 1814, he traveled to Ghent, Belgium, as part of the US delegation to negotiate an end to the war with England; the Treaty of Ghent was signed on Christmas Eve. Subsequently appointed US minister to the Court of St. James’s in May 1815, JQA served in London for the next two years.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) served as the US secretary of state during James Monroe’s presidency. Adams’s duties included organizing and responding to all State Department correspondence and negotiating agreements beneficial to the US. His achievements as secretary of state include the Anglo-American Convention of 1818, which established the US border with Canada along the 49th parallel, and the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819 (Transcontinental Treaty), which resulted in the US acquisition of Florida. JQA also formulated the policy that became known as the Monroe Doctrine, in which the US called for European non-intervention in the western hemisphere, specifically in the affairs of newly independent Latin American nations. As Monroe’s presidency came to an end, JQA was among the top candidates in the 1824 presidential election. When no candidate earned the necessary majority, the House of Representatives decided the election in JQA’s favor in February 1825.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) was inaugurated as the sixth president of the US on 4 March 1825 and began his administration with an ambitious agenda of improvements for American society. His presidency was embattled. Supporters of Andrew Jackson, who believed their candidate had unfairly lost the 1824 election, worked ceaselessly to foil JQA’s plans. Domestically, JQA refused to replace civil servants with partisan supporters, and his administration became involved in disputes between the Creek Nation and the state of Georgia. JQA’s foreign policy also suffered, as partisan bickering in Congress failed to provide timely funding for US delegates to attend the 1826 Congress of Panama. Political mudslinging in advance of the 1828 presidential election was particularly fierce, and by mid-1827 JQA knew he would not be reelected.
In 1831 John Quincy Adams (JQA) became the only former president to subsequently serve in the US House of Representatives. As the chairman of the House Committee on Manufactures, he helped compose the compromise tariff bill of 1832. He traveled to Philadelphia as part of a committee that investigated the Bank of the United States, drafting a minority report in support of rechartering the bank after disagreeing with the committee’s majority report. JQA regularly presented the antislavery petitions he received from across the country, and he vehemently opposed the passage of the Gag Rule in 1836 that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. He opposed the annexation of Texas, and in 1838 he delivered a marathon speech condemning the evils of slavery. JQA also chaired the committee that oversaw the bequest of James Smithson, which was used to establish the Smithsonian Institution.
During his final years of service in the US House of Representatives, John Quincy Adams (JQA) continued to oppose the Gag Rule that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. In 1839 he joined the defense team for the Africans who revolted aboard the Spanish slave ship Amistad. The Supreme Court declared the Amistad Africans free on 9 March 1841 after JQA delivered oral arguments in their favor. In 1842 JQA faced a censure hearing and ably defended himself against charges from southern congressmen. He introduced a successful resolution that finally led to the repeal of the Gag Rule in 1844. JQA voted against both the annexation of Texas in 1845 and the US declaration of war with Mexico in 1846. He collapsed on the floor of the House on 21 February 1848 and died two days later.
r Southard just then came in,
and the President sent for the other members of the Administration,
Mr
Calhoun and Mr Wirt. Mr
Crawford continues convalescent, but was not well enough
to attend— My proposal was that a paper like that which I had prepared,
modified as the President should finally direct, be delivered by me to
the Baron de Tuyll, in the form of an inofficial verbal Note— That I
should invite him to a conference; then read the paper to him, deliver
to him a copy of it, and tell him that I was willing to converse with
him concerning it, if he thought proper. The paper itself was drawn to
correspond exactly with a paragraph of the President’s Message, which he
had read me yesterday, and which was entirely conformable to the system
of policy which I have earnestly recommended for this emergency— It was
also intended as a firm, spirited and yet conciliatory answer to all the
communications lately received from the Russian Government, and at the
same time an unequivocal answer to the proposals made by Canning to Mr Rush— It
was meant also to be eventually an exposition of the principles of this
Government, and a brief developement of its political system as
henceforth to be maintained— Essentially Republican— Maintaining its own
Independence and respecting that of others— Essentially pacific—
Studiously avoiding all involvement in the combinations of European
Politics— Cultivating peace and friendship with the most absolute
Monarchies 169highly appreciating, and anxiously
desirous of retaining that of the Emperor
Alexander, but declaring that having recognized the
Independence of the South-American States, we could not see with
indifference; any attempt by European Powers, by forcible interposition,
either to restore the Spanish dominion, on the American Continents, or
to introduce Monarchical principles into those Countries; or to transfer
any portion of the antient or present American possessions of Spain to
any other European Power— This paper was read, and thereupon ensued a
desultory discussion till near five O’Clock, when the President
adjourned the Meeting till twelve O’Clock to-morrow. Calhoun with many
professions of diffidence and doubt, but only to prompt discussion,
questioned whether it would be proper to deliver any such paper to the Russian Minister— The paper contained
rather an ostentatious display of Republican Principles; it was making
up an issue, perhaps too soon with the Holy Alliance. It would perhaps
be offensive to the Emperor of Russia, and perhaps even to the British
Government, which would by no means relish so much republicanism— He
thought it would be sufficient to communicate to Baron Tuyll a copy of
the paragraph of the President’s Message, to which my paper was adapted—
The Message was a mere communication to our own People— Foreign powers
might not feel themselves bound to notice what was said in that— It was
like a family talking over subjects interesting to them by the fire
side, among themselves— Many things might be said there without offence,
even if a stranger should come among them and overhear the conversation,
which would be offensive, if they went to his house to say them—
Southard and Wirt both observed, that according to that allusion it was
Russia, it was the Holy Alliance, who had come to our House to proclaim
the Virtues and the glories of despotism; and my paper was nothing more
than an answer to them— Calhoun said he thought my paper went rather
farther than their’s. I observed that a copy of that paragraph of the
President’s Message, might suffice for an indication of our principles;
but I thought it due to the honour and dignity of the Nation, that an
explicit and direct answer should be given to the communications from
the Russian Government— After receiving one upon the back of another so
many broad hints from them, the people of this Country, when they come
to the knowledge of it will ask what was said in answer to them— The
answer to the written ratification of the Emperor’s determination not to
receive any Minister from South-America, was the tamest of all State
Papers. The first draft of it had been softened, first at a Cabinet
Meeting—then by an amended draft of the President, and finally by an
amendment of mine upon that of the President— The answers to the
notification of the Emperor’s hope and wish that the United States would
continue their neutrality between Spain and South-America, were merely
verbal— We had no written vouchers of them, but in the copies
confidentially given by the Baron to me, of his despatches to his Court
concerning them— Then came this last Extract of 30. August 1823.
bearding us to our faces, upon the monarchical principles of the Holy
Alliance— It was time to tender them an issue— In the last resort this
was a Cause to be pleaded before the world of Mankind. Our Country, and
the world would require, that our ground should be distinctly taken, as
well as resolutely maintained. Now, in my belief was the time for taking
it; and as I thought the Holy Alliance would not ultimately invade
South-America, and firmly believed that the Emperor Alexander, did not
mean to include us or any consideration of us, in his invectives against
Revolution, I wished to give him an opportunity of disclaiming any such
intention— I believed the Emperor Alexander was honestly wedded to his
system— That he was profoundly penetrated with the conviction that he
was 170labouring for the good of his people, and for
the welfare of mankind. There was no man living, more sensitive to
public opinion, as I knew from a multitude of proofs, but which was
eminently shewn, by the importance which the Government itself attached
to the editorial Article in the National Intelligencer which at the
instance of the Baron de Tuyll, I had caused to be inserted, concerning
the Northwest Coast question— My object in this paper was to appeal much
to the personal feelings of the Emperor Alexander—to his love of Peace—
To his religious impressions— To his sensibility to public opinion— To
his old friendly offices and good-will towards the U. States. I would
search all these sources of action, and bring him either to a formal
disavowal of any dispositions unfriendly to the United States, or to an
express declaration of what his intentions are— Calhoun’s objections
were not supported, but Mr Wirt made a
question far more important; and which I had made at a much earlier
stage of these deliberations— It was whether we shall be warranted in
taking so broadly the ground of resistance to the interposition of the
Holy Allies, by force to restore the Spanish Dominion in South-America—
It is and has been to me a fearful question— It was not now discussed;
but Mr Wirt remarked upon the danger of
assuming the attitude of menace, without meaning to strike: and asked if
the Holy Allies should act in direct hostility
against South-America, whether this Country would oppose them, by War?—
My paper and the paragraph would certainly commit us as far as the
Executive constitutionally could act on this point, and if we take this
course, I should wish that a joint Resolution of the two Houses of
Congress should be proposed and adopted to the same purport— But this
would render it necessary to communicate to them, at least
confidentially, the existing state of things. The Communications from
Mr Canning, were all at his own request,
confidential— Those with Baron de Tuyll were yet so; but he was desirous that part of them should be
published, and I was yet to settle with him whether they should be
communicated to Congress— My wish was to propose to him that they should
all be communicated; and also that the substance of them should be
communicated to Mr Greuhm the Prussian Minister here; for his
Court— The king of
Prussia being one of the members of the Holy Alliance— The
President did not finally decide upon the point of Mr Calhoun’s objection to the delivery of any paper to Baron Tuyll: but retained my draft
and the statement of the transactions between the Baron and me, to
resume the Consideration of them to-morrow. Mr. Wirt objected strongly to one paragraph of my draft; which
he said was a hornet of a paragraph, and he thought would be excessively
offensive— I said it was the cream of my paper; but I am sure the
President will not suffer it to pass— The President seemed to entertain
some apprehension that the Republicanism of my paper, might indispose
the British Government to a cordial concert of operations with us— He
said they were in a dilemma, between their anti-jacobin policy; the
dread of their internal reformers which made them sympathise with the
Holy Allies, and the necessities of their Commerce and Revenue, with the
pressure of their debts and taxes, which compelled them to side with
South-American Independence for the sake of South-American trade— He
believed they must ultimately take this side; but if we should shock and
alarm them upon the political side of the question; and the Holy Allies
could hold out to them any thing to appease the craving of their
commercial and fiscal interest, they might go back to the Allies—as
Portugal has gone back—insignificant and despised; but leaving us in the
lurch, with all Europe arrayed against us— I replied That at all Events
nothing that we 171should now do would commit us to
absolute War— That Great-Britain was already committed more than we—
That the interest of no one of the allied Powers, would be promoted by
the restoration of South America to Spain; that the interest of each one
of them was against it, and that if they could possibly agree among
themselves upon a partition principle, the only possible bait they could
offer to Great-Britain, for acceding to it was Cuba, which neither they
nor Spain would consent to give her— That my reliance upon the
co-operation of Great Britain rested not upon her principles, but her
interest— This I thought was clear. But that my paper came in conflict
with no principle which she would dare to maintain— We avowed
Republicanism, but we disclaimed propagandism; we asserted National
Independence to which she was already fully pledged— We disavowed all
interference with European affairs; and my whole paper was drawn up, to
come in conclusion precisely to the identical declaration of Mr Canning himself, and to express our
concurrence with it— Mr Southard and Mr Wirt supported me in these remarks— After
the adjournment of the meeting, Mr H. Allen called at the
Office. He had a Letter from Commodore
Hull, saying he would be ready to sail on or before the
5th. of next Month— He took leave of me,
intending to go for Norfolk to-morrow— Mr
Gallatin, Mr and Mrs George Sullivan, Mr F. C. Gray, Mr A.
Armstrong, and Dr Huntt, dined with us. I had
invited Mr H. Allen, and Genl. Swartwout; but they declined— John, Mary
Hellen, and Abigail
Adams went to Mrs T. Munroe’s Ball— Our
company left us early; chiefly to go there too— Eve idle— Rain.
