John Quincy Adams’s (JQA) diary, which was inspired by his father John Adams (JA) and started as a travel journal, initiated a lifelong writing obsession. In 1779, twelve-year-old JQA made his second trip abroad to accompany his father’s diplomatic mission. While in Europe, he attended various schools and traveled to St. Petersburg as an interpreter during Francis Dana’s mission to Russia. He subsequently served as JA’s secretary at Paris during the final months before the Anglo-American Definitive Peace Treaty was signed in September 1783. Two years later, JQA returned to the US. After graduating from Harvard College in 1787, he moved to Newburyport to read law under Theophilus Parsons and in 1790 he established a legal practice in Boston. JQA’s skill as a writer brought him public acclaim, and in 1794 President George Washington nominated him as US minister resident to the Netherlands.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) entered diplomatic service in September 1794 as US minister resident to the Netherlands. He married Louisa Catherine Johnson (LCA) in July 1797 after a fourteen-month engagement, and their three sons were born in this period. During his father John Adams’s (JA) presidency they moved to Berlin where, as US minister plenipotentiary, JQA signed a new Prussian-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce. JQA returned to the US in 1801 and entered politics, elected first to the Massachusetts senate in 1802 and then to the US Senate in 1803. His contentious relationship with fellow Federalist members over his support of some Democratic-Republican policies led to his removal from office. In May 1808 the Federalist-controlled Massachusetts legislature voted to replace him at the end of his term, prompting JQA’s resignation in June. Between 1806 and 1809 he also served as the first Boylston Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Harvard.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) returned to diplomatic service in August 1809 as the US’s first minister plenipotentiary to Russia. In St. Petersburg JQA was well-liked by Emperor Alexander I and closely followed the battles of the Napoleonic Wars then raging across Europe. When the US declared war on Great Britain in 1812, Adams watched from afar as the conflict dragged on for two years. In April 1814, he traveled to Ghent, Belgium, as part of the US delegation to negotiate an end to the war with England; the Treaty of Ghent was signed on Christmas Eve. Subsequently appointed US minister to the Court of St. James’s in May 1815, JQA served in London for the next two years.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) served as the US secretary of state during James Monroe’s presidency. Adams’s duties included organizing and responding to all State Department correspondence and negotiating agreements beneficial to the US. His achievements as secretary of state include the Anglo-American Convention of 1818, which established the US border with Canada along the 49th parallel, and the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819 (Transcontinental Treaty), which resulted in the US acquisition of Florida. JQA also formulated the policy that became known as the Monroe Doctrine, in which the US called for European non-intervention in the western hemisphere, specifically in the affairs of newly independent Latin American nations. As Monroe’s presidency came to an end, JQA was among the top candidates in the 1824 presidential election. When no candidate earned the necessary majority, the House of Representatives decided the election in JQA’s favor in February 1825.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) was inaugurated as the sixth president of the US on 4 March 1825 and began his administration with an ambitious agenda of improvements for American society. His presidency was embattled. Supporters of Andrew Jackson, who believed their candidate had unfairly lost the 1824 election, worked ceaselessly to foil JQA’s plans. Domestically, JQA refused to replace civil servants with partisan supporters, and his administration became involved in disputes between the Creek Nation and the state of Georgia. JQA’s foreign policy also suffered, as partisan bickering in Congress failed to provide timely funding for US delegates to attend the 1826 Congress of Panama. Political mudslinging in advance of the 1828 presidential election was particularly fierce, and by mid-1827 JQA knew he would not be reelected.
In 1831 John Quincy Adams (JQA) became the only former president to subsequently serve in the US House of Representatives. As the chairman of the House Committee on Manufactures, he helped compose the compromise tariff bill of 1832. He traveled to Philadelphia as part of a committee that investigated the Bank of the United States, drafting a minority report in support of rechartering the bank after disagreeing with the committee’s majority report. JQA regularly presented the antislavery petitions he received from across the country, and he vehemently opposed the passage of the Gag Rule in 1836 that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. He opposed the annexation of Texas, and in 1838 he delivered a marathon speech condemning the evils of slavery. JQA also chaired the committee that oversaw the bequest of James Smithson, which was used to establish the Smithsonian Institution.
During his final years of service in the US House of Representatives, John Quincy Adams (JQA) continued to oppose the Gag Rule that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. In 1839 he joined the defense team for the Africans who revolted aboard the Spanish slave ship Amistad. The Supreme Court declared the Amistad Africans free on 9 March 1841 after JQA delivered oral arguments in their favor. In 1842 JQA faced a censure hearing and ably defended himself against charges from southern congressmen. He introduced a successful resolution that finally led to the repeal of the Gag Rule in 1844. JQA voted against both the annexation of Texas in 1845 and the US declaration of war with Mexico in 1846. He collapsed on the floor of the House on 21 February 1848 and died two days later.
r Ninian
Edwards Senator from Illinois, called at my Office, 530chiefly for the purpose
of recommending several persons, for offices in the new acquisition of
Florida, among the rest he wishes Mr John Pope of Kentucky to be
appointed one of the three Commissioners of Claims—and also that a
Mr
Walton of Georgia, specially and most earnestly
recommended by Mr Walker the Senator from Georgia, may receive
the appointment of territorial Secretary— The President has already written to
General Jackson, offering
him the Office of Governor of the Territory— I received a Note from the
President, with a large bundle of applications and recommendations for
Office, to be classed. He also requested me to call upon him before
dinner— I received two Notes from General
Vives referring to two Articles of the ratified Treaty,
with a demand of measures for carrying them into execution— I took them
to the President, and had his assent to the answers which I propose to
give there. The President read to me some detached paragraphs of the
Address which he proposes to deliver at his second inauguration. Some
question has been suggested to the President whether he should deliver
on that occasion, any address; some of his
Virginian friends having taken a fancy that it is anti-republican, and
not authorised by the Constitution— I entertained no such opinion, but
told him that if he concluded to omit the address; notice of his
intention should be given in the newspapers, as there would be a great
concourse of people; to witness his taking the Oath; and they would be
much disappointed, if there should be nothing but that naked ceremony.
He will refer the question to a cabinet consultation. The President also
mentioned to me that Mr. Levitt Harris had been with
him and exhibited to him a number of Letters which he, Harris had
received from me, some of them highly confidential— That Harris had told
him the trial of his action against W. D.
Lewis for Slander was expected soon to come on at
Philadelphia. I received last week a Letter from Lewis informing me that
a Commission from the Court had issued to take my deposition. The
President said Harris had told him that he should prove at the trial
that all the witnesses against him in Russia, were perjured villains,
and had intimated that if I should testify to any thing which I had
heard against him from them, he might be compelled in his own defence,
to produce to the Court and Jury these confidential Letters from me,
written some of them after I had left Russia, to prove that I considered
him still as a person worthy of confidence— But there were passages in
the Letters not relevant to the Cause upon trial, which it might not be for the public interest, or which I might
be personally unwilling to disclose to public view; and Harris said he
had brought the Letters that the President and I myself might mark the
passages, which we would wish to have withheld from the Court and Jury—
Harris had read to the President several passages which he himself
considered as of that character; and particularly one of a Letter from
Ghent, written towards the close of the year 1814 and which took a
gloomy view of the state of public affairs at that time— Harris had not
left the Letters with the President, but the paragraph spoke of
Great-Britain of the other European Powers and of our own Affairs, in a
manner which might have some unfavourable effect if now published— Not
in the slightest degree upon my patriotism or integrity; but it might
excite a temporary prejudice against me, particularly on the score of
discretion in committing such Sentiments to a European Post-Office at
that time— The President said he had not promised Harris that he would
speak to me on the subject at-all. He had for some time hesitated
whether he should mention it to me; but he had finally concluded to make
this communication to me, and leave me to determine for myself, what it
would be proper for me to do. If the information that I had,
unfavourable to Harris, was merely of hearsay from these persons in
Russia, I might with propriety decline giving testimony in the case— I
told the President that my knowledge of Harris’s conduct, as implicated
in the trial of this cause, was by no means limited to hearsay. I knew
much from personal observation, and most of all from Harris’s own
admissions. That I wrote confidentially to Harris upon public affairs, I
well remembered, and that there might 531be in those Letters many indiscretions,
and many things not suitable to the public eye, was highly probable; how
far a Court of Justice would admit the production of such papers, having
no relation to the cause before them I knew not, but if they were to be
produced for the purpose of discrediting my testimony, whatever their
effect might be, I must abide by the consequences— I then added that I
could not but consider this application of Mr Harris, as very extraordinary, nor was it possible for me to
avoid ascribing it to motives which I could not approve— It had the
appearance of an attempt to deter me from testifying what I do know, by
a threat of divulging something which I might be afraid should be known
of myself. Such a threat I could treat no otherwise than with defiance.
I should testify of Mr Harris, nothing but
the truth, nor should I say one word the more or the less, for any thing
that it was in Mr Harris’s power to produce,
as having passed between him and me— The President said that he had told
Harris that this step would be liable to such a construction on my part;
and it had been his own reason for doubting whether he ought to have
mentioned it to me at-all— But he should see Harris again, and would
tell him that he should decline all further interposition in the case.—
On returning home from the President’s I looked into my old Letter
Books; and found in the Public Letter Book, Volume 2. all the Letters to
Harris, which I wrote him from Ghent, and among the rest the Letter from
which he had read the extract to the President. I saw immediately,
Harris’s drift, first in reading this extract to the President;
secondly, in the threat of producing it to the Court and Jury; and
thirdly in the offer to withhold it, if the President or I would express
the wish that it should be withheld— It is in page 192. 193. of the
Letter Book dated the 16th of November 1814—
In describing the dangers of our situation, it said among other things
that we had a “feeble and penurious Government”— Harris thought the
President would take this as a reflection upon the administration of
that time and that it would excite his distrust of me— The extract spoke
in terms of extreme bitterness against the British Government and
certain British Officers by name— It spoke of the policy, pursued by the
other powers of Europe, not excepting Russia, with Anger and
Indignation— In my present public situation, I might be very unwilling
that the British and Russian Governments should know, what I thought of
them then. The extract spoke of the retreat of the British from
Plattsburg, and of their repulse from Baltimore, as more disgraceful to
them than glorious to us; the publication of which would wound the
National pride of the Country— All this had no more relation to the
cause of Harris upon trial, than it had to the trial of Jonathan Wild the great; but Harris
fancied I should be afraid of having it come before the public, and took
this indirect way through the President to remind me of what he can do, if hard pushed; and above all to deter me
from producing his Letters of 3, 4. and 6. June 1812. My course of
proceeding was at once plain before me— To tell the President that
Harris might produce any Letter from me that he possessed, and to
explain to him my motives which I perfectly recollected for writing to
Harris that Letter, at that time— I spent this Evening at home.
