John Quincy Adams’s (JQA) diary, which was inspired by his father John Adams (JA) and started as a travel journal, initiated a lifelong writing obsession. In 1779, twelve-year-old JQA made his second trip abroad to accompany his father’s diplomatic mission. While in Europe, he attended various schools and traveled to St. Petersburg as an interpreter during Francis Dana’s mission to Russia. He subsequently served as JA’s secretary at Paris during the final months before the Anglo-American Definitive Peace Treaty was signed in September 1783. Two years later, JQA returned to the US. After graduating from Harvard College in 1787, he moved to Newburyport to read law under Theophilus Parsons and in 1790 he established a legal practice in Boston. JQA’s skill as a writer brought him public acclaim, and in 1794 President George Washington nominated him as US minister resident to the Netherlands.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) entered diplomatic service in September 1794 as US minister resident to the Netherlands. He married Louisa Catherine Johnson (LCA) in July 1797 after a fourteen-month engagement, and their three sons were born in this period. During his father John Adams’s (JA) presidency they moved to Berlin where, as US minister plenipotentiary, JQA signed a new Prussian-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce. JQA returned to the US in 1801 and entered politics, elected first to the Massachusetts senate in 1802 and then to the US Senate in 1803. His contentious relationship with fellow Federalist members over his support of some Democratic-Republican policies led to his removal from office. In May 1808 the Federalist-controlled Massachusetts legislature voted to replace him at the end of his term, prompting JQA’s resignation in June. Between 1806 and 1809 he also served as the first Boylston Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Harvard.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) returned to diplomatic service in August 1809 as the US’s first minister plenipotentiary to Russia. In St. Petersburg JQA was well-liked by Emperor Alexander I and closely followed the battles of the Napoleonic Wars then raging across Europe. When the US declared war on Great Britain in 1812, Adams watched from afar as the conflict dragged on for two years. In April 1814, he traveled to Ghent, Belgium, as part of the US delegation to negotiate an end to the war with England; the Treaty of Ghent was signed on Christmas Eve. Subsequently appointed US minister to the Court of St. James’s in May 1815, JQA served in London for the next two years.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) served as the US secretary of state during James Monroe’s presidency. Adams’s duties included organizing and responding to all State Department correspondence and negotiating agreements beneficial to the US. His achievements as secretary of state include the Anglo-American Convention of 1818, which established the US border with Canada along the 49th parallel, and the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819 (Transcontinental Treaty), which resulted in the US acquisition of Florida. JQA also formulated the policy that became known as the Monroe Doctrine, in which the US called for European non-intervention in the western hemisphere, specifically in the affairs of newly independent Latin American nations. As Monroe’s presidency came to an end, JQA was among the top candidates in the 1824 presidential election. When no candidate earned the necessary majority, the House of Representatives decided the election in JQA’s favor in February 1825.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) was inaugurated as the sixth president of the US on 4 March 1825 and began his administration with an ambitious agenda of improvements for American society. His presidency was embattled. Supporters of Andrew Jackson, who believed their candidate had unfairly lost the 1824 election, worked ceaselessly to foil JQA’s plans. Domestically, JQA refused to replace civil servants with partisan supporters, and his administration became involved in disputes between the Creek Nation and the state of Georgia. JQA’s foreign policy also suffered, as partisan bickering in Congress failed to provide timely funding for US delegates to attend the 1826 Congress of Panama. Political mudslinging in advance of the 1828 presidential election was particularly fierce, and by mid-1827 JQA knew he would not be reelected.
In 1831 John Quincy Adams (JQA) became the only former president to subsequently serve in the US House of Representatives. As the chairman of the House Committee on Manufactures, he helped compose the compromise tariff bill of 1832. He traveled to Philadelphia as part of a committee that investigated the Bank of the United States, drafting a minority report in support of rechartering the bank after disagreeing with the committee’s majority report. JQA regularly presented the antislavery petitions he received from across the country, and he vehemently opposed the passage of the Gag Rule in 1836 that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. He opposed the annexation of Texas, and in 1838 he delivered a marathon speech condemning the evils of slavery. JQA also chaired the committee that oversaw the bequest of James Smithson, which was used to establish the Smithsonian Institution.
During his final years of service in the US House of Representatives, John Quincy Adams (JQA) continued to oppose the Gag Rule that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. In 1839 he joined the defense team for the Africans who revolted aboard the Spanish slave ship Amistad. The Supreme Court declared the Amistad Africans free on 9 March 1841 after JQA delivered oral arguments in their favor. In 1842 JQA faced a censure hearing and ably defended himself against charges from southern congressmen. He introduced a successful resolution that finally led to the repeal of the Gag Rule in 1844. JQA voted against both the annexation of Texas in 1845 and the US declaration of war with Mexico in 1846. He collapsed on the floor of the House on 21 February 1848 and died two days later.
r Dickinson called here and introduced a young
man from New-York, by the name of Hone.— While he was here, Mr H. G. Otis called, but
supposing me to be engaged, left word that he wished to see me on the
part of Mr
Martin— As I was going out, I met at the door Mr Bailey,
with a young man from Philadelphia, by the name of Rogers, whom he introduced— I went
with George to the Senate chamber,
to see Mr Otis— He was engaged in business
there, but told me that he would call on me at the Department, after the
adjournment of the Senate, which he did— He then said that Martin had
called upon him yesterday, apparently in great irritation, and
complained that I had forbidden him my house; and had requested him to
see me, and to assure me of the propriety of his conduct. He had related
to him what had passed the Evening before, between him and my Son
George— Told him that he had been perfectly satisfied with George’s
explanation and had considered it as an affair entirely settled— He had
therefore been astonished at the offence which I had taken, and had
wished Mr Otis to say to me, that Martin’s
conduct had only been such as the vindication of his own honour
required— He said that it had been his intention to treat my Son George
with the utmost civility, and delicacy— That the note he had written to
him was in the most respectful and friendly language, and that his
motive in sending for George to meet him alone at Strother’s was precisely to avoid
every appearance of formality; and to confine his request for an
explanation, entirely between themselves. Otis then proceeded to tell me
of his acquaintance with Martin, who lodges and messes at the same house
with him at Georgetown— Martin he said was first introduced to him by
Mr
Goldsborough formerly a Senator from Maryland, and a
relation of Martin’s— On his coming here this winter, Otis had heard
that he had come in pursuit of a young Lady, whom her friends had sent
here to be out of his way— He had observed that at one of Mrs
Adams’s weekly parties, Mr
Martin did not come—that at a subsequent one he proposed to come, and
did come with him; not without some apprehension on Otis’s part, that he
might be thought by us to be introduced by him— Afterwards the incidents
occurred at Gales’s and at my
house, which gave rise to this affair with George and which Otis related
to the minutest point exactly as George had told them to me— But last
Saturday Otis said, Martin had come to him in a state of high excitement
and told him he had been informed that my Son George had reported his
having been told by Mr Otis, that Martin had
asserted to him that there was an engagement of marriage between
Miss Johnson and himself.
Otis said he had told Martin he was sure there must be some mistake in
the matter— He had never said so to my Son, and he was confident George
never had reported from him, what he had not said— And he had then told
Martin the incidents which did occur, and from which this
misunderstanding appeared to have arisen, as he now told them to me.
Martin had then left him, and yesterday came to him again with his new
complaint— He seemed to hope that I should upon being informed of all
the Circumstances, acquit him of any intention of disrespect to me, and
revoke the interdiction to him of my house. I told Mr Otis that I was disposed to make every
proper allowance, for the excesses of a young man who appeared to be
frantic with passion. But the peace, and quiet and health of my family
had been too grossly outraged by Martin, to be forgiven on a mere
declaration by him that he intended no disrespect— As to his call for an
explanation upon my Son, I had told him I should not interpose in that—
But in the first place the young Lady herself explicitly denies, not
only that George ever said to her what Martin called upon him to
explain, but that she ever told Martin, that George had made such a
report to her. George therefore had never said any thing which 491Martin had any right to call upon him to explain—
Martin had done him precisely the injury which he had complained of
having received from him. He had imputed to him a false report, upon
allegations themselves false— And as to his forms of proceeding; his
plea of polite language was ridiculous— I repeated the terms of the
Note—the summons upon business, and without
delay; the direct intimation to him at Strother’s, with a horse-whip on
the table, that he had it from the most unquestionable authority that
George had said so and so—and if he had that he must retract it or fight
him— Here was an avowed unequivocal, contingent challenge—given upon
false pretences—and sent in a manner, as if purposely intended to alarm
my whole family— I was not much versed in the forms appropriate to the
code of honourable murder, but of this I was sure; they never authorized
a Gentleman to send for another to come to him in the Night at a tavern,
alone to give him an explanation, or to fight him— As to the report that
Fanny Johnson had been sent by her friends to my house to keep her out
of Martin’s way, it was quite groundless. She was here at the earnest
invitation of Mrs Adams, and myself; being
an orphan Grand-daughter of the late Governor Thomas Johnson, of Fredericktown, Maryland, and
daughter to a first Cousin of
my wife’s— Martin had visited at my house, as many other Strangers do,
in the Winter, and had been invited to Mrs.
Adams’s weekly parties. After what had taken place, his company at my
house could no longer be acceptable; and as to his assuming to enjoin
upon my son George to spare the feelings of Miss Johnson, in my opinion
he would have been better employed, in enjoining it more effectually
upon himself— Otis said he had suggested himself to Martin, that
delicacy to the young Lady would not consist in making her a subject of
public talk— That the circumstances which I had mentioned presented a
case very materially different from that stated by Martin— He understood
that I would not re-admit Martin to my house, but upon his
acknowledgment that he had been wrong. He, Otis could therefore no
longer with any usefulness interfere in the affair— Martin had asked him
for a certificate of the propriety of his conduct, but he should now
excuse himself from taking any further part whatever in the transaction—
And with this he left me— I received a Letter from Lewis Williams Chairman of the
Committee of Claims, asking further explanations upon the subject of
Captain O’Brien’s case—
Mrs. W. S. Smith dined with us. Mary Hellen is recovering, but does not
yet leave her chamber.
