John Quincy Adams’s (JQA) diary, which was inspired by his father John Adams (JA) and started as a travel journal, initiated a lifelong writing obsession. In 1779, twelve-year-old JQA made his second trip abroad to accompany his father’s diplomatic mission. While in Europe, he attended various schools and traveled to St. Petersburg as an interpreter during Francis Dana’s mission to Russia. He subsequently served as JA’s secretary at Paris during the final months before the Anglo-American Definitive Peace Treaty was signed in September 1783. Two years later, JQA returned to the US. After graduating from Harvard College in 1787, he moved to Newburyport to read law under Theophilus Parsons and in 1790 he established a legal practice in Boston. JQA’s skill as a writer brought him public acclaim, and in 1794 President George Washington nominated him as US minister resident to the Netherlands.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) entered diplomatic service in September 1794 as US minister resident to the Netherlands. He married Louisa Catherine Johnson (LCA) in July 1797 after a fourteen-month engagement, and their three sons were born in this period. During his father John Adams’s (JA) presidency they moved to Berlin where, as US minister plenipotentiary, JQA signed a new Prussian-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce. JQA returned to the US in 1801 and entered politics, elected first to the Massachusetts senate in 1802 and then to the US Senate in 1803. His contentious relationship with fellow Federalist members over his support of some Democratic-Republican policies led to his removal from office. In May 1808 the Federalist-controlled Massachusetts legislature voted to replace him at the end of his term, prompting JQA’s resignation in June. Between 1806 and 1809 he also served as the first Boylston Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Harvard.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) returned to diplomatic service in August 1809 as the US’s first minister plenipotentiary to Russia. In St. Petersburg JQA was well-liked by Emperor Alexander I and closely followed the battles of the Napoleonic Wars then raging across Europe. When the US declared war on Great Britain in 1812, Adams watched from afar as the conflict dragged on for two years. In April 1814, he traveled to Ghent, Belgium, as part of the US delegation to negotiate an end to the war with England; the Treaty of Ghent was signed on Christmas Eve. Subsequently appointed US minister to the Court of St. James’s in May 1815, JQA served in London for the next two years.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) served as the US secretary of state during James Monroe’s presidency. Adams’s duties included organizing and responding to all State Department correspondence and negotiating agreements beneficial to the US. His achievements as secretary of state include the Anglo-American Convention of 1818, which established the US border with Canada along the 49th parallel, and the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819 (Transcontinental Treaty), which resulted in the US acquisition of Florida. JQA also formulated the policy that became known as the Monroe Doctrine, in which the US called for European non-intervention in the western hemisphere, specifically in the affairs of newly independent Latin American nations. As Monroe’s presidency came to an end, JQA was among the top candidates in the 1824 presidential election. When no candidate earned the necessary majority, the House of Representatives decided the election in JQA’s favor in February 1825.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) was inaugurated as the sixth president of the US on 4 March 1825 and began his administration with an ambitious agenda of improvements for American society. His presidency was embattled. Supporters of Andrew Jackson, who believed their candidate had unfairly lost the 1824 election, worked ceaselessly to foil JQA’s plans. Domestically, JQA refused to replace civil servants with partisan supporters, and his administration became involved in disputes between the Creek Nation and the state of Georgia. JQA’s foreign policy also suffered, as partisan bickering in Congress failed to provide timely funding for US delegates to attend the 1826 Congress of Panama. Political mudslinging in advance of the 1828 presidential election was particularly fierce, and by mid-1827 JQA knew he would not be reelected.
In 1831 John Quincy Adams (JQA) became the only former president to subsequently serve in the US House of Representatives. As the chairman of the House Committee on Manufactures, he helped compose the compromise tariff bill of 1832. He traveled to Philadelphia as part of a committee that investigated the Bank of the United States, drafting a minority report in support of rechartering the bank after disagreeing with the committee’s majority report. JQA regularly presented the antislavery petitions he received from across the country, and he vehemently opposed the passage of the Gag Rule in 1836 that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. He opposed the annexation of Texas, and in 1838 he delivered a marathon speech condemning the evils of slavery. JQA also chaired the committee that oversaw the bequest of James Smithson, which was used to establish the Smithsonian Institution.
During his final years of service in the US House of Representatives, John Quincy Adams (JQA) continued to oppose the Gag Rule that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. In 1839 he joined the defense team for the Africans who revolted aboard the Spanish slave ship Amistad. The Supreme Court declared the Amistad Africans free on 9 March 1841 after JQA delivered oral arguments in their favor. In 1842 JQA faced a censure hearing and ably defended himself against charges from southern congressmen. He introduced a successful resolution that finally led to the repeal of the Gag Rule in 1844. JQA voted against both the annexation of Texas in 1845 and the US declaration of war with Mexico in 1846. He collapsed on the floor of the House on 21 February 1848 and died two days later.
th. of March were of a full Month— From this
moment I take a new start. Called on Mr
Crawford at his Office. He had a Letter from Mr Cheves
the President of the Bank since his return to Philadelphia. The
Directors had resolved to employ Mr D. Sheldon to negotiate the
reloan of the remaining Louisiana Stock— They passed the Resolution
before receiving Mr Crawford’s Letter
written in consequence of my last Conversation with him, stating that
the propriety of appointing him for that agency was doubtful. He asked
me now, as the appointment had been made, whether it would be necessary
to insist upon its being revoked; or whether it might be allowed, on
condition that only Sheldon’s expences in negotiating the business
should be paid; or with the allowance of a further compensation— I told
Mr Crawford that I did not think it
necessary to persist in objecting to the employment of Sheldon for this
affair— The principal objection in my mind had been to the blending the
character of a Public Minister of the United States, with that of an
Exchange Broker for the Bank— It would not apply so strongly to the case
of a Secretary of Legation, and in this instance I should withdraw it
altogether; on the decisive consideration that the Government itself has
an interest in the success of the negotiation— But it must be with the
understanding that it will take Sheldon from his proper service only for
a short time; and that he shall make an arrangement satisfactory to
Mr
Gallatin, for supplying his place during his absence. On
these conditions, I thought he might go; and besides the payment of his
expences might receive a reasonable compensation from the Bank, for the
service— I then returned to Mr Crawford the
Letter from the Collector at
Baltimore to him, concerning the Spanish, king’s brig,
brought into Baltimore by Daniels,
and which he had sent me; and I read to him the Letter from the District Attorney Glenn to me,
concerning the prosecution of these Baltimore Pirates. Glenn says that
the vigilance and zeal of the subordinate custom-house Officers, and of
the Captains of the Revenue Cutters might be usefully spirited and
invigorated for the effectual suppression of this mischief. Crawford
promised to give Instructions accordingly— I told him I had received
another Letter from Baltimore, from J. J.
Appleton with further information, upon the subject—and a
Note from Mr
Onis, the Spanish Minister; demanding the restoration of
the King’s Brig— I thought this was a regular and correct application,
but I had some difficulty as to the mode of proceeding proper for the
case— Whether the Spanish Consul
could libel the vessel as belonging to the king of Spain— Or whether we could direct a seizure of
her by the Government, for the purpose of restoring her to Spain— we
considered this question, and concluded that the best course would be
for the Spanish Consul to libel the vessel— Crawford observed it was
unfortunate that the Attorney
General was now absent— I asked Mr Crawford how the Treasury stood at this time; it being a
period of great pecuniary pressure; and embarrassment. He said there
were in the Months of February and March, great deficiency in the
receipts from Norfolk in Virginia, but none considerable, from the other
Sea Ports— But from the Western Country the receipts from the Sales of
Lands had very greatly fallen off, and were dwindling down to nothing—
The situation of the United States at this time in regard to their
commerce, revenue, manufactures, agriculture, banking Institutions, and
political economy generally is such that the most special attention to
it is due from those who are in the public service and most especially
from the members of the Administration— I deeply lament that my time is
so much absorbed by other, and more immediate and indispensable duties
that I have scarcely any left for thoroughly investigating this— In the
midst of Peace, and of partial prosperity, we are approaching to a
crisis which will 95shake
the Union to its centre— I see violent and threatening symptoms of the
disease, without knowing where to look for the remedy. I asked Crawford
what foundation there was for certain reports very unfavourable to the
reputation of Coll. R. M. Johnson, the late Representative from
Kentucky— He said he had a Letter from a Mr Benton, who was a
thorough-going Man, which contained all the information that he had on
the subject; and he gave it to me to take with me to read— He said he
fully believed that Johnson was an honest, and well meaning man; but he
was so excessively weak and credulous, that he suffered knaves and
swindlers to work upon him till they destroyed all his moral
perceptions; all capacity to discriminate between right and wrong; and
made him do just what they pleased. He had thus suffered himself to be
drawn into unwarrantable Banking Speculations by a man named Prentiss from Boston or that
neighbourhood; and one Smith, a
nephew of the late President of Princeton
College.— I took the papers with me and read them in the
course of the day. My opinion of Johnson after reading them, is less
charitable than that of Crawford— I neither think him so imbecil nor so
honest; under the guise of a generous, warmhearted, affectionate man, he
is a mere unprincipled speculator— Let me not lose the feeling of
indulgence for human frailty. When these facts come once to be generally
known, Johnson’s character and reputation will be blasted. It is indeed
probably already ruined in his own State— I regret it, for from the part
which he took in the House of Representatives the last Session, and the
relations which it introduced between him and me, I had formed a more
favourable opinion of him. As I was going to my office, I was overtaken
by a person named Heron, who
followed me, with a Letter from A. W.
Foster of Greensburgh; and a model in brass and steal of a
machine, invented by him, being an improvement on the mode of applying
power to wheel machinery— Mr Foster has a
high idea of the importance of his invention for which he wishes a
patent here, and information how to obtain a patent in various European
Countries. I advised Mr Heron to deposit his
model in the patent office, and to get a drawing of it to be made, and
also there deposited— A Mr Haw, residing in the neighbourhood of
Georgetown, came with two Letters; one for his Son, in South America, and the other for
Dr
Forsyth an American, residing at Angostura— The son at the
age of 19. had followed the Fortunes of M’Gregor, and accompanied him to Amelia-Island— Left it
soon after M’Gregor; went to Angostura; entered Bolivar’s army; and in January 1818.
was appointed a Captain of Artillery. His father said he had received a
Letter from him written at that time; and with a tear glistening in his
eye, added he had never heard from him since; and feared he should never
hear from him again— I could not tell him my feelings at this statement;
lest they should aggravate his own—but I promised him to take care that
the Letters should be forwarded to Dr.
Forsyth— Mr Hyde de Neuville, the French Minister came to
ask for an order to the Collector at Baltimore, for the restoration of
certain French property, piratically captured, and libelled by the
French Consul— A parcel
of the same property he said had been thus restored to the French Consul at Alexandria; and Mr Crawford thought it could be done in like
manner at Baltimore—but de Neuville thought it would require a short
Letter from me to the District Attorney, or to the Judge— I told him
that according to our Institutions; it would be improper for any Member
of the Executive administration, to write to the Judge; but if he would
write me setting forth the facts, I would then, if there would be any
propriety in the measure write to the district attorney concerning it— I
returned him the copy of Count
Palmella’s Note which he had lent me, and of which he
consented that I should furnish Mr J. Graham
with a copy. He then referred to the Answer I had sent him to his
proposal for declaring some half a dozen Piracies, additional to those
already recognized by the Law of Nations— He was not altogether
satisfied with my answer to it. He admitted however, that there might be
some inconvenience in constituting for many new Capital Offences— He
asked if I had any late news from France, and appeared to be quite
uneasy at the accounts of the addition of fifty or sixty new members to
the house of Peers— I had nothing recent from Mr Gallatin, but lent De Neuville, all the latest newspapers
that I had received from France. We had also some Conversation
respecting the new 96Treaties of Great Britain with Spain, Portugal and the Netherlands,
allowing a mutual right of search to armed vessels, and joint Courts for
trying Slave traders. I told him I was glad that France and Russia at
Aix La Chapelle had refused acceding to this principle of mutual search
in time of Peace— But he thought it would not be inadmissible for the
purpose of abolishing effectually the Slave-trade— He said he was sure
there would be no Slaves in the United States in forty years from this
time— There would be to be sure in Louisiana; but then Louisiana would
not form a part of the United States— I said that Civil War would then
be substituted, instead of the Union— We had a small party to dinner—
Mr and Mrs W. S. Smith, Mr I. P.
Hutchinson, Mr. Maury, and his nephew from Liverpool, Forbes, Bailey and R.
Forrest, also Tom
Hellen and Robert
Buchanan, with whom Mrs Adams went home after
dinner.
