John Quincy Adams’s (JQA) diary, which was inspired by his father John Adams (JA) and started as a travel journal, initiated a lifelong writing obsession. In 1779, twelve-year-old JQA made his second trip abroad to accompany his father’s diplomatic mission. While in Europe, he attended various schools and traveled to St. Petersburg as an interpreter during Francis Dana’s mission to Russia. He subsequently served as JA’s secretary at Paris during the final months before the Anglo-American Definitive Peace Treaty was signed in September 1783. Two years later, JQA returned to the US. After graduating from Harvard College in 1787, he moved to Newburyport to read law under Theophilus Parsons and in 1790 he established a legal practice in Boston. JQA’s skill as a writer brought him public acclaim, and in 1794 President George Washington nominated him as US minister resident to the Netherlands.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) entered diplomatic service in September 1794 as US minister resident to the Netherlands. He married Louisa Catherine Johnson (LCA) in July 1797 after a fourteen-month engagement, and their three sons were born in this period. During his father John Adams’s (JA) presidency they moved to Berlin where, as US minister plenipotentiary, JQA signed a new Prussian-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce. JQA returned to the US in 1801 and entered politics, elected first to the Massachusetts senate in 1802 and then to the US Senate in 1803. His contentious relationship with fellow Federalist members over his support of some Democratic-Republican policies led to his removal from office. In May 1808 the Federalist-controlled Massachusetts legislature voted to replace him at the end of his term, prompting JQA’s resignation in June. Between 1806 and 1809 he also served as the first Boylston Professor of Rhetoric and Oratory at Harvard.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) returned to diplomatic service in August 1809 as the US’s first minister plenipotentiary to Russia. In St. Petersburg JQA was well-liked by Emperor Alexander I and closely followed the battles of the Napoleonic Wars then raging across Europe. When the US declared war on Great Britain in 1812, Adams watched from afar as the conflict dragged on for two years. In April 1814, he traveled to Ghent, Belgium, as part of the US delegation to negotiate an end to the war with England; the Treaty of Ghent was signed on Christmas Eve. Subsequently appointed US minister to the Court of St. James’s in May 1815, JQA served in London for the next two years.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) served as the US secretary of state during James Monroe’s presidency. Adams’s duties included organizing and responding to all State Department correspondence and negotiating agreements beneficial to the US. His achievements as secretary of state include the Anglo-American Convention of 1818, which established the US border with Canada along the 49th parallel, and the Adams-Onis Treaty of 1819 (Transcontinental Treaty), which resulted in the US acquisition of Florida. JQA also formulated the policy that became known as the Monroe Doctrine, in which the US called for European non-intervention in the western hemisphere, specifically in the affairs of newly independent Latin American nations. As Monroe’s presidency came to an end, JQA was among the top candidates in the 1824 presidential election. When no candidate earned the necessary majority, the House of Representatives decided the election in JQA’s favor in February 1825.
John Quincy Adams (JQA) was inaugurated as the sixth president of the US on 4 March 1825 and began his administration with an ambitious agenda of improvements for American society. His presidency was embattled. Supporters of Andrew Jackson, who believed their candidate had unfairly lost the 1824 election, worked ceaselessly to foil JQA’s plans. Domestically, JQA refused to replace civil servants with partisan supporters, and his administration became involved in disputes between the Creek Nation and the state of Georgia. JQA’s foreign policy also suffered, as partisan bickering in Congress failed to provide timely funding for US delegates to attend the 1826 Congress of Panama. Political mudslinging in advance of the 1828 presidential election was particularly fierce, and by mid-1827 JQA knew he would not be reelected.
In 1831 John Quincy Adams (JQA) became the only former president to subsequently serve in the US House of Representatives. As the chairman of the House Committee on Manufactures, he helped compose the compromise tariff bill of 1832. He traveled to Philadelphia as part of a committee that investigated the Bank of the United States, drafting a minority report in support of rechartering the bank after disagreeing with the committee’s majority report. JQA regularly presented the antislavery petitions he received from across the country, and he vehemently opposed the passage of the Gag Rule in 1836 that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. He opposed the annexation of Texas, and in 1838 he delivered a marathon speech condemning the evils of slavery. JQA also chaired the committee that oversaw the bequest of James Smithson, which was used to establish the Smithsonian Institution.
During his final years of service in the US House of Representatives, John Quincy Adams (JQA) continued to oppose the Gag Rule that prevented House discussion of petitions related to slavery. In 1839 he joined the defense team for the Africans who revolted aboard the Spanish slave ship Amistad. The Supreme Court declared the Amistad Africans free on 9 March 1841 after JQA delivered oral arguments in their favor. In 1842 JQA faced a censure hearing and ably defended himself against charges from southern congressmen. He introduced a successful resolution that finally led to the repeal of the Gag Rule in 1844. JQA voted against both the annexation of Texas in 1845 and the US declaration of war with Mexico in 1846. He collapsed on the floor of the House on 21 February 1848 and died two days later.
ménagement . . . and
then the caution that was to be observed to shew that there was no
change of system; and then all the clamour about this great convoy from
Gothenburg—and then all these things put together—and the different
opinions—and the different interests. . . But as for every thing that
216depends upon me that has been done; and I
will see if I cannot have the matter brought on from another quarter— I
urged to him that the vessels had now been kept nearly four months
without a decision; that the Emperor himself and Count Romanzoff continually had assured me of the
determination of this Government to favour the American Commerce, and I
had made it an invariable principle to meddle with no other— That I
considered it my duty to respect the Laws of the Country; but it was
also my duty to maintain the rights of my Country, and the lawful
Commerce of my Countrymen. That I knew the French Ambassador had interfered
against us in these cases, and before the admission of the greatest
number of these vessels, I had supposed that political considerations
might have some influence in the business— But now, after the principal
step had been taken— “Between ourselves,[”] said he, [“]I can tell you
that that difficulty is entirely subdued—there is no question of that
kind left.[”]— I mentioned to him the case of the Eliza, at Archangel,
belonging to Mr: Thorndike, and concerning which Mr: Dana
made application to me— She actually came directly from the Island of
Teneriff; and part of her Cargo has been sentenced to be confiscated by
the Commission of neutral Navigation, because some of her papers bore
the same signatures, with those which had been found to be false on
board the vessels which were condemned last Summer, and which were
English vessels, from English Ports, but pretended to have cleared from
Teneriffe— I said I had not seen the Papers; but that from my personal
knowledge of the owner, and of his agent, now here, and from the solemn
assurances which I had received from him, I had no doubt but that the
vessel came from Teneriff; that she had not been in England, and that
the Cargo was entirely American property— The Baron said that he did not
know why the Commission at Archangel, had felt itself bound by the
decisions of the Commission here, in cases the Circumstances of which if
similar in one or two particulars were different in many others— The
Teneriffe vessels condemned here, had Cargoes, not at-all suited to the
place from which they pretended to come— There were declarations of the
Sailors, that they came from elsewhere— Some of their papers had
signatures which were known to be false—those which were produced in the
case of the Eliza, were indeed the same, as two of those which had been
suspected in the papers of the condemned vessels, but that was only one
of a variety of grounds upon which the condemnation had ensued— He took
a minute of this case, and said he would see what he could do about it.—
I asked him whether it would be expedient for me to write a Note to
Count Romanzoff on the subject, and he said he thought it would. There
was the case of the Rapid too, about which Mr:
Stieglitz was talking with the Baron, when I went in— He
said that if in the course of two or three days, the Commission should
not get through, and admit the remainder of that Cargo, he would thank
me to send him a short note with a statement of the case, and he would
see to it— I told him it was a great hardship that genuine Americans
should be put to so much embarrassment to defend themselves against the
charge of producing false Papers— That men of honour and integrity found
both their reputation and their property jeopardized by such
proceedings— I then referred him to the Declaration of the French
Government concerning the Certificates of Origin of the French Consuls
in the United States; which Declaration I had repeatedly assured him was
altogether contrary to the fact— I could now shew him documents to prove
my assertions; upon which I shewed him the Copy of Mr:
Geraud’s Certificate which I received from Mr: Joy, and
the original certificate itself of the whole Cargo of the Brig Syren
Captn:
Howland, given by Louis
Felix, the French Consul at New-York, and dated 28. July
1810.— The Baron expressed great astonishment at the sight of these
Papers; the first of which I told him I had shewn to the Ambassador— He
asked me what the Ambassador had said to it— I told him that he had
shrugged his shoulders and acknowledged that he knew not what to say—
The Ambassador had no more doubt than I had that those were authentic
papers— But he had orders to declare the contrary, and what was it for
him to say?— The Baron then put me many questions respecting the present
State of our affairs with France, and the conduct of France towards the
United States— He enquired why the measures on both sides had been
calculated upon the dates of 2. Novr: and 2.
Feby: which I explained to him from the
Law of Congress of the last Session— He then entered upon the general
consideration of the policy of France, and asked me, if I had read an
Article in the last Moniteur, concerning the Continental System— I had
not seen the Moniteur; but I had just received the Hamburg
Correspondent, and had read the Article in a German translation— The
substance of the argument was that although the Continent suffered very
much by the Continental System, the Government’s did not lose their
revenues, and the People could live through it, but that it must lead to
the total ruin of England, because England had a depretiated paper
Currency which already lost fifteen or sixteen per Cent in the market—
As to the Continental System I said, that would undoubtedly last just as
long as the Emperor Napoleon
217should choose to continue his experiment, and as
long as such articles as this should appear in the Moniteur— If there
was a change of Ministry in England, the orders of Council, which I
certainly abhorred as much as the Emperor Napoleon would certainly be
revoked, and then he might exult with triumph as much as if his
Continental System had extorted the revocation— They would be revoked,
because the new Ministry would be composed of men, who from the
beginning had pledged themselves against the measure, and who had
already made several attempts to obtain their repeal— But it would not
be the effect of the Continental system; and if the present ministry
should be continued they would undoubtedly adhere to them— I said that
when the Moniteur, and the other French political writers argued against
the British Orders in Council, they could not miss being right— Those
orders were in such utter defiance and contempt of every principle of
the law of Nations, that nothing too severe could be said against them,
but when the French writers extolled the effects of the Continental
System, as counteraction to the Orders in Council, I thought as little
of their reasoning, as I confided in their facts— The Moniteur for
instance now insisted that England was upon the verge of total ruin,
because she had a paper currency that lost 15 or 16 per Cent— It
contended that the Continent was in a flourishing Condition because
France lost none of her revenues; and because France had nothing but
gold and silver— I did believe that a national bankruptcy, partial or
total would be inevitable in England— But what of that? France had
committed bankruptcy three or four times since her Revolution— And in
annexing Holland to the French Empire, she had made her commit a
bankruptcy no longer ago than last Summer— France considered it as the
simplest operation in the world to reduce a public debt to one third of
its amount, and tell the creditors, they must esteem themselves very
happy to receive their interest upon that— With what face then could
France pretend that England was at the point of dissolution because she
had a paper that lost 15 or 16 per Cent— As to France’s losing none of
her revenues; and having nothing but gold and silver; that might be
true— And it might satisfy her too to consider her own condition as
answering for that of the whole Continent— She could throw all the
burthens of this state of things upon Austria, upon Prussia, upon
Denmark, upon Sweden, upon Russia, and reckon their sufferings for
nothing at all; but they suffered never the less for that— As to a
depretiated paper, I hoped that was not to be considered as a signal of
National Ruin; for if it was the whole Continent, excepting France was
in a far more ruinous Condition than England, having paper much more
deeply depretiated— The Baron then asked me what I thought of the
probability of a Negotiation for Peace; which I told him I had long been
of opinion would not take place untill the English have evacuated Spain
and Portugal— I considered that as the only question yet remaining to
contend about seriously— He said he was afraid that would yet be for a
long time undecided— That it did not appear as if they would soon be
expelled from Portugal— That if they should be compelled to embark at
Lisbon they might immediately afterwards disembark again in some part of
Spain— That the war seemed to be raging in almost all the Spanish
Provinces, and that the king,
Joseph, as well as the king of
Naples talked of abdication— I said
I did not think this last Circumstance of much consequence as to the
negotiation for Peace— Spain was to be under french domination under one
shape or another, and it mattered little who was to be its nominal
Governor— But the Spanish Colonies were to be forever separated from
their Metropolis, and they would not come under french domination— The
Emperor Napoleon’s Marriage had manifestly effected a total revolution
in his political system— He had formerly been inclined to form a system
of federative monarchies, placing his brothers and
Sisters at
their head— But since he had a prospect of posterity himself, the
royalties of all his brothers would probably meet a similar fate to that
of the kingdom of Holland— The Baron appeared to coincide in these
opinions, but he was not so free as I was to express his opinions upon
general opinio politicks— I told him that
the Emperor Napoleon very often wanted such a Monition as was once given
to Peter the Great— In one of
his fits of Passion, he threatened violence against one of his Officers,
who simply said, Your Majesty will do as you please, but your History
will tell of it; and Peter immediately checked his hand— Napoleon had
been in great want of somebody to say to him, your History will tell of
it; throughout the whole series of these Spanish transactions, and
especially for the Scenes at Bayonne— The Baron said that Talleyrand had undoubtedly
rendered him that service, though without success.— After leaving the
Baron, I called upon General
Pardo, to invite him and his
daughter to dine with us next Saturday— I found the
General unwell, confined to his chamber, and Miss Pardo, he told me was
still more unwell— But they will come if sufficiently recovered— I also
called at the French Ambassador’s but he was not at home— I then left my
sleigh and walked round the Quay and the line, home— I dined at 218General
Watzdorf the Saxon Minister’s—the only company were Counts
Schenk and Bussche— Baron’s Schladen & Mülinen
Mr:
Jouffroy, and Messrs:
Smith, Everett and Gray— Count St: Julien came in
after dinner— I paid in the Evening a visit at Mr:
Krehmer’s, who lives in the upper Story over General
Watzdorf— Mr:
and Mrs: Bayley were there—
Mr: Krehmer apologized to me for not
having visited me this Winter— He said he had been labouring under so
many embarrassments that he had not had the courage to go out any where
from his home— But he hoped now soon to get through them all, and he
would call and see me next week— I sincerely wish his hopes may be
realized— Remainder of the Evening at home.
